In my professional opinion i believe that the right to bear arms is only a for self-defense and nothing else and i also belive that curtain people should have the privlige to have guns in the house.
It is a constitutional right to be able to own and bear arms in your own house for self defense because according to the second amendment, people have the right to keep and bear arms. In Texas, people don't even need to have a license to own a gun unless they plan on concealed carrying, but even certain places do not allow guns. But criminals are criminals – they do not follow laws, which is why we should be able to have arms for self defense. Also, under the Texas "Castle Doctrine," people have the right to possess guns in their house for protecting themselves, their family, or their property.
Yes, it is a constitutional right to be able to own and bear arms in your own house for self defense. I also agree with Jose that this is a privilege for curtain people, so they have to earn it.
The right to bear arms can be constitutional or unconstitutional for a few reasons. If the arms are used for self defence or for purly sport reasons, then it is constitutional. But if the guns are used to mislead, mistreat, or for armed robbery, then it is NOT constitutional to bear arms. In order to attain arms, people HAVE to have a legal license and to use the arms for a good cause, not for a bad one.
The Second Amendment is the right to bear arms. This is a consitutional right because it is an amedment. The right to bear arms in your own house for self defense is legal but a license is needed to own weapons/guns. When you use the guns/weapons outside your house to kill and commit violence it is becoming an unconstitutional right and therefore you can be taken to jail and even accused because this is not legal. I find the right to bear arms perfectly fine because we are able to know we have something to protect ourselfs in our homes.
One man said, "If a man intrudes on your property that is not welcomed and you don’t have a have a gun, how do you shoot him". Forget all laws that are in existence, the only thing that man must worry about is man himself. We hunt each other for items that we trade for other items or paper. This is what man does. To protect these items of ours we must protect ourselves, whether it means a lock on our doors or a firearm in our hands. We must protect ourselves we the need arises. Plus we must have ample amount of firearms and ammunition to prepare for WWZ. Is it constitutional, yes because the government knows that people need to be able to hold our own but the reason why this is constitutional because they know of the infected and they want to prepare for it.
Yes its constitutional to have possession of weapons, is in the second amendment, right to bear arm . For me is right to have this amendment , is one for one can protect themselves and their family. in my years of profession i seen people with guns in their house is right to have a weapon in their house but you cannot have to much.
In my professional opinion i believe that the right to bear arms is only a for self-defense and nothing else and i also belive that curtain people should have the privlige to have guns in the house.
ReplyDeleteIt is a constitutional right to be able to own and bear arms in your own house for self defense because according to the second amendment, people have the right to keep and bear arms. In Texas, people don't even need to have a license to own a gun unless they plan on concealed carrying, but even certain places do not allow guns. But criminals are criminals – they do not follow laws, which is why we should be able to have arms for self defense. Also, under the Texas "Castle Doctrine," people have the right to possess guns in their house for protecting themselves, their family, or their property.
ReplyDeleteYes, it is a constitutional right to be able to own and bear arms in your own house for self defense. I also agree with Jose that this is a privilege for curtain people, so they have to earn it.
ReplyDeleteThe right to bear arms can be constitutional or unconstitutional for a few reasons. If the arms are used for self defence or for purly sport reasons, then it is constitutional. But if the guns are used to mislead, mistreat, or for armed robbery, then it is NOT constitutional to bear arms. In order to attain arms, people HAVE to have a legal license and to use the arms for a good cause, not for a bad one.
ReplyDeleteThe Second Amendment is the right to bear arms. This is a consitutional right because it is an amedment. The right to bear arms in your own house for self defense is legal but a license is needed to own weapons/guns. When you use the guns/weapons outside your house to kill and commit violence it is becoming an unconstitutional right and therefore you can be taken to jail and even accused because this is not legal. I find the right to bear arms perfectly fine because we are able to know we have something to protect ourselfs in our homes.
ReplyDeleteOne man said, "If a man intrudes on your property that is not welcomed and you don’t have a have a gun, how do you shoot him". Forget all laws that are in existence, the only thing that man must worry about is man himself. We hunt each other for items that we trade for other items or paper. This is what man does. To protect these items of ours we must protect ourselves, whether it means a lock on our doors or a firearm in our hands. We must protect ourselves we the need arises. Plus we must have ample amount of firearms and ammunition to prepare for WWZ. Is it constitutional, yes because the government knows that people need to be able to hold our own but the reason why this is constitutional because they know of the infected and they want to prepare for it.
ReplyDeleteYes its constitutional to have possession of weapons, is in the second amendment, right to bear arm . For me is right to have this amendment , is one for one can protect themselves and their family. in my years of profession i seen people with guns in their house is right to have a weapon in their house but you cannot have to much.
ReplyDelete